Company Journal

Measuring volumetric flow at the compressor

Measuring volumetric flow at the compressor: measurement concept, measurement points and evaluation

Key Points at a Glance

  • Each method initially captures a specific primary measured variable. Whether this becomes an operating, mass, or standard volumetric flow depends on the method and on the evaluation in the device or in downstream software.
  • A volumetric flow value without a stated reference condition is not comparable. Operating volumetric flow, standard volumetric flow, and mass flow are three different variables.
  • Installation conditions can influence measurement deviation just as strongly as the choice of measurement principle. What matters are the upstream and downstream straight runs specified by the manufacturer for the device.
  • The additional pressure drop depends on the measurement principle, design, and installation. Clamp-on ultrasonic devices do not intrude into the flow cross-section and therefore create no additional pressure drop; orifice plates and in-line meters do.
  • Measurement points arise from the decision they are meant to support. One measurement per compressor is required if machine contribution, control behavior, or machine split is to be assessed—otherwise not.
  • Calibration status, parameterization, and installation conditions are part of any evaluation that later supports an investment decision.

A supplier asks for the actual volumetric flow. Energy management wants a KPI per hall area. Maintenance suspects a base load but cannot prove it. All three concerns lead to the same task: a flow measurement that is fit for decision-making.

The difference between usable and unusable measured values rarely comes down to the device. It arises from the question of which variable is being measured, where it is captured, and which reference condition the result is later meant to refer to.

This article describes the measurement concept: which variable common methods primarily capture, how this becomes operating, mass, or standard volumetric flow, where measurement points make sense, and which errors invalidate the evaluation.

First clarify: which variable should be measured

In practice, three variables are often mixed up. Operating volumetric flow describes the volume flowing through the pipe at the actual operating pressure and actual temperature. Standard volumetric flow converts this volume to an agreed reference condition. Mass flow describes the air mass transported per unit time. It does not require a volumetric reference condition; however, this is required to output standard volumetric flow.

For any comparison with manufacturer specifications, the reference condition is decisive. The terms reference condition, standard condition, and standard volume are defined in DIN 1343; the numerical values stated there must be taken from the standard itself. Internationally, other reference temperatures are also common, which is why numerical values from different sources are not comparable without stating the reference conditions.

On the manufacturer side, ISO 1217 governs acceptance tests for positive displacement compressors, including volumetric flow and power requirement. However, this does not mean that every delivery rate stated in every data sheet uses the same reference condition. Which test condition and which reference condition underlie a specific value must be taken from the respective data sheet.

In practice, this means: before procurement, define which variable the device should output and which reference condition is stored. This definition belongs in the request to the supplier and in every later evaluation. The requirements that downstream compressed air treatment places on volumetric flow and air condition are part of the same definition.

Measurement principles and their primary measured variable

Measurement principle Primary measured variable and path to the result Practical notes
Thermal / calorimetric Measures convective heat transfer at the heated element and derives mass flow from it. Many devices output a standard volumetric flow directly because the conversion is stored in the device Usually as an insertion probe with minimal intrusion into the cross-section. Oil film, dust and condensate on the sensor change heat transfer; how much depends on the device and the air condition
Vortex meter (vortex) Measures the shedding frequency behind a bluff body and derives the actual volumetric flow from it. For standard values, pressure and temperature compensation is required, which is integrated or external depending on the device No moving parts. Below a device-specific minimum flow, the method does not deliver a usable signal; refer to the manufacturer’s specification for the limit
Differential pressure (orifice plate, Venturi, Pitot tube) Measures a pressure differential; the volumetric flow is calculated via a square-root relationship. Standard values require additional pressure and temperature values Well-documented method. The square-root relationship limits the usable measuring range. Orifice plates create a permanent pressure loss
Ultrasonic transit-time method Measures flow velocity from the transit-time difference and derives the actual volumetric flow from it. Conversion to standard values depends on the device As a clamp-on variant, with no intrusion into the flow cross-section and therefore no additional pressure loss. The result depends on pipe material, wall thickness, internal diameter and acoustic coupling
Turbine and paddle-wheel meters Measures the rotational speed of an impeller and derives the actual volumetric flow from it Simple principle with a clear readout. Moving parts are subject to wear; oil and particles can affect the rotation and therefore the reading

Two points are important for evaluation. First: where the conversion to standard conditions takes place—inside the device or in downstream software—must be known, otherwise it is inadvertently performed twice or not at all. Second: whether a method is suitable for small volumetric flows, contaminated air, or short inlet runs depends on the device. General rules of thumb do not replace checking the specific data sheet.

Derive measurement points from the decision

It is not the available connections that determine the measurement points, but the question that needs to be answered. The following mapping has proven effective.

Question to be answered Suitable measurement point
How much air does the station provide in total? Basis for design and KPIs Station outlet downstream of treatment
How is the delivery rate distributed across the machines, and how do they behave in a combined system? Per compressor—only required if machine contribution, control behavior, or machine split is to be assessed
Which area consumes how much, and where is the base load? Per branch or hall area, with the option to isolate the area
Does a single process meet its requirement? At the relevant consumer—only if a specific decision depends on this value

Anyone who wants to allocate base load consumption to individual areas needs measurement points at the branches and the ability to isolate those areas. Without isolation, the allocation remains an assumption. How an overall picture emerges from multiple measurement points is described in the article on the compressed air audit.

Installation determines accuracy

Methods that rely on a defined flow profile are sensitive to disturbances upstream and downstream. Bends, valves, reducers, filters, and dryers distort the profile over a considerable run length. The manufacturer specifies how long the required upstream and downstream straight runs are for the device; the values differ significantly depending on method and design.

With insertion probes, insertion depth and alignment are added factors. The probe must sit at the intended position in the flow profile and be aligned with the flow direction. Both are installation tasks and cannot be corrected later by calculation.

Planning must also include the air condition at the installation location and serviceability. Upstream of the dryer, moisture and, in some cases, entrained condensate are to be expected; whether a device is suitable for this is stated in its documentation. A bypass line with shut-off valves allows removal for calibration without interrupting supply.

For pressure drop, a clean chain of cause and effect is essential. Additional pressure drop initially reduces pressure at the consumer. How the station’s power draw changes depends on control, operating point, and whether the setpoint is raised to compensate. The article on compressed air costs puts the role of pressure losses in the overall calculation into context.

Measuring range and resolution

The expected smallest and largest volumetric flow must lie within the measuring and accuracy range specified by the manufacturer. An oversized device is not a safety buffer: low consumption during non-production times may then fall below the range in which the device still achieves the guaranteed accuracy—and this is precisely the most meaningful range for base load and leakage assessment.

Temporal resolution is also part of the selection. Short demand peaks are only captured if sampling rate and averaging time represent them. The dynamics a device can deliver are device-specific and must be taken from the documentation.

Implementation step by step

  1. Define the purpose: design, consumption allocation, base load assessment, or permanent monitoring. Measurement variable, measurement points, and resolution depend on this.
  2. Estimate expected volumetric flows, minimum and maximum, including non-production times.
  3. Define the measurement variable and reference condition and include them in writing in the request.
  4. Select the measurement principle and check it against air condition, contamination risk, permissible pressure drop, measuring range, and dynamics.
  5. Define the installation location according to the manufacturer’s specification; provide a bypass line and shut-off valves.
  6. Have installation and electrical connection carried out by authorized and qualified personnel; connect to control systems only via approved interfaces.
  7. Check parameterization: internal pipe diameter, reference condition, units, output signal, time base, and where standardization is performed.
  8. Plausibility check: validate measured values against load hours, energy demand and, if available, cross-check against a second measurement point.

Measured values become KPIs

A flow measurement becomes a basis for decisions when fixed KPIs are derived from the trend: volumetric flow in a defined time window with no consumption, average consumption during production, and the magnitude, duration, and frequency of peaks. These three variables answer different questions and are not interchangeable.

If values are recorded continuously instead of once, change also becomes visible: a rising base load without a new continuous consumer, a growing peak after a system expansion, changed control behavior after a software update. How continuous recording fits into a networked plant is shown in the article on the Smart Factory.

Typical mistakes

  • Not defining the reference condition and mixing operating volumetric flow with standard volumetric flow.
  • Not clarifying whether standardization is performed in the device or in the evaluation software—and therefore applying it twice or not at all.
  • Confusing gauge pressure and absolute pressure during conversion.
  • Deriving the internal pipe diameter from the nominal size instead of from the actual wall thickness.
  • Installing the device directly downstream of a bend, valve, or reducer without complying with the manufacturer’s requirement for the inlet run.
  • Installing an insertion probe without controlled insertion depth and alignment.
  • Choosing an oversized device so that consumption during non-production times lies outside the accurate range.
  • Ignoring the device’s pressure drop during selection and later compensating it by raising the setpoint.
  • Measuring only during production so the base load during standstill is not visible.
  • Not documenting the calibration status and still using the measured value as evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I have to open the pipe for a flow measurement?

Not in every case. Insertion probes require a drilled hole with a welded socket or an existing measurement point. Clamp-on ultrasonic devices work from the outside, but require precise information on pipe material, wall thickness, and internal diameter, as well as a suitable coupling location. Which option fits depends on pipe material, accessibility, and the required accuracy.

Can I measure power draw instead of flow?

For an energy analysis, yes; for a quantity statement, not directly. Power draw describes the machine’s electrical demand. Volumetric flow can only be reconstructed from it if delivery rate and control behavior under the relevant operating conditions are known and validated. The result is then an estimate and must be labeled as such.

How many measurement points does a mid-sized system need?

There is no universally valid number. Starting at the station outlet provides the total quantity. Further measurement points follow where an allocation or decision requires them—for example at branches to areas that are to be assessed separately or isolated. One measurement per compressor pays off as soon as machine split or control behavior is on the table.

How often does a flow meter need to be calibrated?

The interval results from the manufacturer’s specification, the operating conditions, and the importance of the measured value. Contamination, condensate, and oil can accelerate drift. If the value is used for billing or investment decisions, the calibration status belongs in every evaluation.

Next step